Table of contents
We have compared 26 robot vacuum cleaners without a mop function and ranked them all from best to worst.
Based on: 144,864 user reviews 53 expert reviews
Rank | Image | Robot vacuum | Score | Verdict | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
iRobot Roomba i4+ | 90 | Good | $510 |
2 |
|
Eufy RoboVac X8 | 88 | Good | $500 |
3 |
|
Eufy RoboVac 15c MAX | 87 | Good | $190 |
4 |
|
iRobot Roomba 981 | 87 | Good | $480 |
5 |
|
Eufy RoboVac 30C | 87 | Good | $249 |
6 |
|
iRobot Roomba i7 | 87 | Good | $418 |
7 |
|
iRobot Roomba i7+ | 87 | Good | $651 |
8 |
|
Eufy RoboVac 11s | 86 | Good | $120 |
9 |
|
Eufy RoboVac 11s MAX | 86 | Good | $160 |
10 |
|
Eufy RoboVac 15c | 85 | Good | $200 |
The mop function has become a popular feature for robot vacuum cleaners because it allows the robot to both sweep and wash the floor. Today, 54% of all robot vacuum cleaners come with a mop function. However, there are also good reasons to choose a robot vacuum cleaner without a mop.
Not everybody wants a robot vacuum cleaner that also mops. Here are the main reasons why people prefer to buy a robot vacuum without a mop function:
You can find our comparison of robot vacuum cleaners with a mop function here.
|
|
|
||
Name | iRobot Roomba i4+ | Eufy RoboVac X8 | Eufy RoboVac 15c MAX | |
Score |
90
|
88
|
87
|
|
Rank | Rank 13 of 56 | Rank 15 of 56 | Rank 17 of 56 | |
Reviews |
(4.5)
79 reviews
|
(4.4)
288 reviews
|
(4.3)
22048 reviews
|
|
Price | $510 | $500 | $190 |
Max runtime | 90 min | 180 min | 100 min | |
Charge time | 180 min | 360 min | ||
Type of battery | Li-ion | Li-ion | Li-ion | |
Battery capacity | 2200 mAh | 5200 mAh | 2600 mAh | |
Recharge and resume function | ||||
Automatically docks and recharges |
Cleaning area | 1937.34 ft2 | 1291.56 ft2 | ||
Sound level | 60 dB | 55 dB | ||
Suction power | 2000 Pa | 2000 Pa | ||
Maximum climbing height | 0.71 in | 0.63 in | ||
Power | 25.0 w | |||
Number of cleaning modes | 4 | |||
Dustbin capacity | 0.4 l | 0.4 l | 0.6 l | |
Type of filter | LDS | HEPA | ||
Carpet Boost | ||||
Scheduling function | ||||
Shape | Round | Round | Round | |
Number of side brushes | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Washable filter |
Mopping function | ||||
Water tank capacity | 0.25 l | |||
Vibrating mop | ||||
Automatic mop lift |
Mapping-Sensor | LDS | None | ||
Object recognition | ||||
Stair sensor and object sensor | ||||
For multiple rooms |
App control | ||||
Remote control | ||||
Voice control | ||||
Alexa voice control | ||||
Google Home voice control |
Automatic dirt disposal | ||||
Dustbag capacity | ||||
Automatic water tank refilling | ||||
Automatic mop drying | ||||
Automatic mop washing |
App control | ||||
Interactive mapping | ||||
Real Time Tracking | ||||
Digital Blocked Area | ||||
Zoned Cleaning | ||||
No mop zones | ||||
Multi Floor Maps | ||||
Selected Room Cleaning |
Height | 3.64 in | 3.82 in | 2.83 in | |
Width | 13.39 in | 13.58 in | 12.8 in | |
Depth | 13.39 in | 13.58 in | 12.8 in | |
Weight | 7.05 lbs | 7.72 lbs | 5.95 lbs |
Pros |
Auto-empty base
Dirt detect technology
Dual rubberized brush rollers
Smart navigation system
Comes with a physical virtual wall device
|
Smart navigation and mapping capability
Compresses the dirt in the dust bin to create more space
Automatically adjusts suction power depending on the floor type
App and voice control
Strong suction power
|
Can automatically increase suction on carpets
Can be controlled through the remote control, app, and voice integrations, such as Alexa and Google Assistant
Low and compact profile
Produces low noise level
Affordable
Large dust bin
|
|
Cons |
A bit overpriced
Makes a loud noise when self-emptying
Saves only one map
|
Expensive
No mopping attachment
Can’t fit under low-lying furniture
|
No mapping ability
Doesn’t support virtual boundaries and magnetic strips
Random navigation
|
Creator
Hi, my name is Klaus Bachmann, and I am the creator of Reoverview.com. I have been working with household appliances for several years now. I publish unbiased comparisons, based on user reviews, expert reviews and test results. Hope you like the website.
Best regards, Klaus.